|
Monday, November 02, 2009 |
Gaudin Should Be Starting Game 5
Fact: AJ Burnett is much better at home. Fact: Cliff Lee is pitching tonight and if the Yankkees can't muster anything against him, you waste Burnett. Fact: Burnett would be on regular rest in Game 6. Fact: This forces Pettitte to pitch on short rest.
I think Girardi is overplaying his hand here. We'll see.Labels: 2009 world series, a.j. burnett, andy pettitte, joe girardi, pitching rotation
posted by Mr. Faded Glory @ 12:17 PM
0
comments
 
|
Tuesday, January 06, 2009 |
Either your Brains or your Signature Will be on the Contract
 Andy Pettitte is being ridiculous. Based on his performance of last year and the recent previous years, he doesn't deserve more than $10M/yr for what he's projected to produce. Who would be more valuable to a team in 2009, Milton Bradley or Andy Pettitte? Bradley signed a 3 year deal for $10M per. Just because the Yankees did Pettitte a huge favor in 2007 when they picked up his $16M option for 2009 despite the fact that the Mitchell Report had just come out and named Pettitte for HGH use does not mean they have to do it again. Face it Andy, the Yankees did you a huge solid last year and overpaid you and helped you out when the best you could have hoped from the rest of the league was a possible invitation to camp. You don't turn around and slap them in the face the following year. Labels: andy pettitte, godfather
posted by Mr. Faded Glory @ 10:36 AM
1
comments
 
|
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 |
Thanks For Nothing, Andy
While the crowd was busy booing one player on the offense last night, they seem to have forgotten that Pettitte's pitching was the real reason that game was lost yesterday.
People still want to resign Andy for next year?
He's got a 4.24 ERA and an ERA+ of 97. Not awful, but below league average. Wouldn't that money be better spent (because you know he'd want at least $11M or so) to throw into a free agent like, say, CC Sabathia?
Mussina's been more effective, and he'd most likely be cheaper. I think he'd take less because he's hungry to win a ring before he retires.
Wang, Chamberlain, Mussina, Sabathia and Hughes? Could be the best five in the AL.Labels: andy pettitte, cc sabathia, dumbass fans, moose, pitching rotation, pitching woes
posted by Mr. Faded Glory @ 10:57 AM
1
comments
 
Why is Richard Justice Still Employed?
Not only does Justice not understand the very basics of the sport he covers, he is notorious for making huge over-generalizations about it constantly, and is incredibly biased in favor of his home town of Houston.
Of course this means the Sporting News hires him on as a national contributor, because only shock journalists get any play anymore. Well, except Stephen A. Smith.
So Justice has more opinions about the Yankees and native son Andy Pettitte who he defended tooth and nail when he was an Astro.
Pettitte, Cashman eras could be winding down for Yankees Posted: April 6, 2008
We appear to be seeing the beginning of the end of Andy Pettitte's marvelous career, and if you care about the New York Yankees, this may be more bad news than you can digest in one sitting. Pettitte barely decided to come back this year. It wouldn't, I think, shock anyone that an aging Pettitte may hang them up after this season.
In a related move, Brian Cashman likely will end up leaving, too. By, say, this time next year, the Yankees as you once knew them will no longer exist. And... why exactly is this a related move? "Shit, Andy's gone? Fuck this team, I was trying to build around him, I'm outs, yo."
The Yankees will go back to the future, back to a time when they ran chaotically, spent wildly and never won a thing. Ok, for starters, I don't see why he's saying Cashman is gone, but I will - for the sake of this paragraph - offer the assumption that he will. Why exactly does that portend "chaotic, wild spending" and "not winning a thing"? Look, I love Cashman as a GM, but I don't think he's the only one in the game who can avoid wild, undisciplined and foolish spending. In fact, Gene Michael and Bob Watson avoided it before Cashman was promoted.
Right now, you're thinking change is a good thing. You're thinking it was a good idea for Joe Torre to hit the road. You're fucking right I am. I danced a jig when that happened, and I don't even know how to dance a jig.You're probably thinking the same about Brian Cashman, since he got cold feet when it came time to pull the trigger during the Johan Santana trade discussions. What? No. Why would I think that? He didn't have "cold feet" anyway, the Twins were asking for too much. Look at what they ended up taking for Santana - it certainly was no Hughes + Cabrera + Jackson + White type deal.
You're tired of hearing about the long-term interests of the franchise. You want now. No. Christ, seriously? Why is it that 29 other major league teams get to build for the future, but when the Yankees even entertain such an idea the media pulls shit like this? Shut up, Richard Justice. The Yankees still ahve a very good chance to win this year AND build for the future.
But eventually, you're going to look back at the years in which Torre and Cashman ran the Yankees as the best time of your baseball-following life. Twelve seasons, twelve playoff appearances, four championships, six pennants, 10 division championships. Those were great years. Don't get me wrong. Still, tyhe daily agita as I watched Torre blow out arms and play older, less good players over younger, more good players is now gone. Remember Torre playing the infield in during the 2001 World Series? Bringing in Jeff Weaver in the 2003 Series in a tie game in extra innings while Rivera rotted on the bench? Refusing to bunt on a pitcher whose fucking ankle is bleeding all over the goddamned field because it's not classy? Those are decisions that cost championships. No, I am glad that era is over.
Actually, the real Brian Cashman-Joe Torre years were between 1996 and 2001. During those six seasons, the Yankees won the American League five times and the World Series four times. That's about as dominant as a baseball team can be in this era of parity. Brian Cashman became the GM in 1998, so... okay, Richard. Whatever man, just arbitrarily assign "real years."
Just be glad there's no Professor Richard Justice teaching your kids. "Look I know your books will tell you the Mesozoic Era lasted from 251 million years ago to about 65 million years ago, but the real Mesozoic Era? Well the real Mesozoic Era lasted from 350 million years ago until June 27, 1542, when Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo set sail to explore the west coast of America.:
Everything changed on that emotional night in 2001, when Arizona beat the Yankees in Game 7 of the World Series. That was the night George Steinbrenner blew through the clubhouse and promised there'd be changes.
He was tired of not winning championships since he'd gone an entire agonizing year without one. He was going to do it his way. He did, too.
He returned to the old days of buying free agents, trading for big-name players and treating the Yankees like a fantasy league team. Some guys never learned. This is a hugely popular and oft-repeated but entirely incorrect misconception. If anything, 2001 was a testament to sticking with an aging core for too long. The 2000 Yankees weren't nearly as good of a team as in prior years, and the 2001 version saw that decline continue. Yes, they were able to make the Series both years, but changes should have been made prior to better the team for the next few years. However, Steinbrenner stuck by his "warriors" and that was that. Those players left en masse after 2001, and there were some free agents signed to replace them, most notable Jason Giambi. However I don't see a problem with signing the reigning AL MVP to replace a guy whose best days were clearly behind him (although it seems, so were Giambi's).
The Yankees were going to change, anyway, as the core of those championship teams -- Paul O'Neill, Scott Brosius, Tino Martinez, et al. -- got older. Steinbrenner wanted big, splashy replacements, and somewhere along the way, the chemistry got all screwed up. Enough with the chemistry bullshit argument. It's amazing that a team can go through a regular season and win the division year in and year out and chemistry isn't an issue, and then get into a short series and if they lose, it's because they "had no chemistry."
look, the 1977 Yankees hated each other's fucking guts. Reggie Jackson disparaged Thurmon Munson in articles. Billy Martin attacked Reggie in the dugout. Graig Nettles gave cocaine to Fran Healy's toddler. Dick Howser forced himself repeatedly on Gabe Paul. Every morning, Mickey Rivers pissed on Lou PIniella's hat.
And still, they won the World Series. Two years in a row. So shut the fuck up about chemistry being a requirement to win, please. It's bullshit, and it's a lazy was to excuse the fact that you have no idea what you're talking about.
One day, Torre and Cashman looked up and could barely recognize their clubhouse. Instead of the tight, cohesive, team-first group they'd had, the Yankees were now a bunch of independent contracts. Cashman didn't recognize the players he'd signed, traded for, or developed? Well shit, if this is the case I agree, he should go and has no place running a franchise.
Gary Sheffield. Randy Johnson. Jose Contreras. Alex Rodriguez. Jaret Wright. Carl Pavano. All-Star. Hall of Famer coming off a great year. Question mark whom everyone wanted on their teams. Possibly the greatest player ever who won two MVPs in four years. Fringe starter. Middle of rotation starter who can't stay healthy.
Brian Cashman recognizes no one.
The Yankees were as much a tax bracket as a team, and it's absolutely amazing that they kept making playoff runs. They weren't a team in the same sense that the Brosius-O'Neill squads had been. Yes, they were a team in the same sense, they just didn't win World Championships because of lack of: using Rivera in the Series, playing the infield back, bunting on a bledding-legged pitcher, and depth of starting rotation. Still I am fairly certain they were a team.
Cashman approved some of those bad moves, but mostly he went along with what Steinbrenner and the organization's Tampa office wanted. Then, when Steinbrenner's health began to fail a couple of years ago, Cashman got full control of baseball operations.
He did the right thing, the thing that will pay off for years to come. He stopped making short-term moves and began pouring millions into player development.
No matter what happens this season, the Yankees are poised to contend for years to come unless player development is gutted to bring in older guys. So... wait, I thought you said that's what the Yankees are going to do? Also that we should want Cashman gone? Ok, now you lost me.
Cashman may ultimately leave the Yankees because he made a long-term move in a short-term city. He refused to give up three or four of his best young players for Santana.
Cashman believed the Yankees didn't need Santana. He believed that Andy Pettitte -- and young guys like Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy -- could help the Yankees be competitive in 2008 and beyond.
When he made that decision, he had no way of knowing the turn Andy Pettitte's life would take.
His offseason would be blown apart by the revelation in the Mitchell Report that he'd used human growth hormone. That was just the beginning of the bad news.
Pettitte would soon testify against his former best friend, Roger Clemens. He would watch Clemens and another close friend, Brian McNamee, engage in a war of words that likely will end with one of them in jail. Yeah I'm fairly certain that Cashman's plan wasn't to build around "Andy and the kids." I bet Cash had a lot more interest in teh long-term benefits of, say, Chien-Ming Wang. Who, amazingly, hasn't even been mentioned yet.
He wasn't prepared for the beginning of the spring training or the start of the regular season. He was hit hard and often Saturday by the Tampa Bay Rays.
"I just didn't have anything," he told reporters. I figured that's where we were going with this line of reasoning. It's completely specious reasoning. This is how Justice thinks: (A) happened. After that, (B) happened. Therefore, (b) happened because (A) happened.
Let me try one. Neil Armstrong got married. Then, Neil Armstrong walked on the moon. Therefore, Neil Armstrong is an astronaut who walked on the moon because he hated his wife. Simple, see?
Ian Kennedy also got roughed up in his first start, but since sample sizes are fun, we must assume it's because he did lots of mescaline and then punched his best friend in the dick.
Afterward, his body language spoke volumes. His back has been hurting, and his elbow, too. He has been devastated by the end of his relationship with Clemens, and at times, his closest friends have expected him to simply pack up and return home.
He probably never would have returned to the Yankees if not for his commitment to Cashman and the organization. He knew the role he'd played in the Santana discussions, and he felt an obligation.
He probably also knew that Cashman might have done the deal and not re-signed Pettitte if he'd known then what he knows now. He knows that the new man in charge of the Yankees, Hank Steinbrenner, is going to make Cashman's life hell if this season turns south. Or he probably wanted to continue playing baseball. Or probably wanted another $16M. Or probably wanted to show he can win without drugs. Or probably wants another series ring. Or probably missed Jeter's soulful renditions of Motown classics on the charter plane.
Cashman's friends already predict he'll leave after this season because Hank Steinbrenner likely will be making the baseball decisions that Cashman and Torre once made. Lack of evidence: 1, easily-defensible journalism: 0.
Pettitte could be at the breaking point, and he knows it. He's miserable about this. No athlete you'll ever know reveals his moods with his words and gestures as much as Pettitte. If he's unhappy, he'll let you know he's unhappy.
When he played for the Astros, I bumped into him as he headed out the clubhouse door. With the club off the next day, I asked what he had planned.
"Going to boil crawfish with the family," he said.
He couldn't have been happier. He loves pitching and surely loves the money. He has never enjoyed the adulation or the celebrity. He's a simple kid from Deer Park, Texas. He loves simple things. Simple things, like pitching and money, both of which he gets from the Yankees this year, which of course you neglected to mention as possible reasons for his return.
I'm guessing he would have retired after the Mitchell Report rather than face the barrage of questions and suspicions. In the end, he said quitting would be "cowardly." Also, there was that commitment to Cashman. Yeah, quitting because of the report would be kinda cowardly.
This could be a long, tough season for these two honorable men, and that's really a shame. Or it could be a great season and you'll bitch about how the Yankees bought another championship. Could go either way, really.Labels: andy pettitte, brian cashman, douchebag, richard justice, specious reasoning
posted by Mr. Faded Glory @ 11:13 AM
5
comments
 
|
Wednesday, February 13, 2008 |
Let the Witch Hunt Begin
America has troops fighting and dying in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere abroad. Our economy is in poor shape, and the president is considering sending every citizen a check as a "stimulus" package. American children keep falling behind the rest of the world in education. The infrastructure of the country is in desperate need of attention, as has been evidenced by lax and corrupt policies in regards to the levees in New Orleans and the bridge collapse in Minneapolis. Luckily, we have Congress on our side to concentrate huge amounts of time, money, and energy on figuring out whether one individual did hGH or not.
While Congress would have you believe this is somehow about "children" and protecting "children" that is so far from the truth as to be laughable.
There were a total of 89 players and former players listed in the Mitchell report. Out of those 89, how many did Congress summon for this hearing designed to "protect children"? Three: Roger Clemens, Andy Pettitte, and Chuck Knoblauch. Clemens is the big name, of course; Pettitte is an All-Star pitcher in the big leagues. Knoblauch hasn't smelled a ball field in over 5 years and has nothing to do with baseball. Why choose these three and only these three? Simple: Congress is simply out to "get" Roger Clemens, so they're picking his teammates who also had contact with McNamee. Their goal as a committee is to be able to say they "got" someone and most likely to attempt to bring him up on perjury charges at one point.
Kirk Radomski, whose name appears more often than any other in the report and who is personally responsible for about 80% of the information and accusations contained therein, was excused from the hearing and allowed to simply give a deposition. Why, if this is truly about "truth" and "protecting the kids" was the guy who has the most information and in exchange for speaking with a baseball investigator was granted freedom from prison, not asked to appear in public?
This is a witch hunt, pure and simple, and Clemens is wearing the pointed hat. Don't be fooled into thinking that this is anything else.
Did Clemens use steroids or hGH? I don't know, I wasn't there. It's certainly possible and there is ample evidence to suggest as such. That, however, is irrelevant to this discussion. Whether or not he used or not, the Mitchell Report was an incomplete study with the majority of the evidence coming from two people facing serious jail time. Congress is simply choosing the "biggest name" from the report in an effort to make a big splash on the front and back pages of newspapers.
Hopefully, it will keep buried reports from Iraq, studies of failing grades in public education, and stories crumbling bridges in the midwest. I mean, we elect people to federal government to focus on retired athletes as priority one, right?Labels: andy pettitte, douchebag, mitchell report, roger clemens
posted by Mr. Faded Glory @ 9:28 AM
3
comments
 
|
Wednesday, December 19, 2007 |
Mark Feisand is Smoking Too Much Pot
This has to be one of the most ridiculous news stories I have ever seen published in a major newspaper, and that is saying a LOT.
Mariano Rivera attempting to squeeze option year as Yankee deal nears
BY MARK FEINSAND DAILY NEWS SPORTS WRITER
Wednesday, December 19th 2007, 4:00 AM
Mariano Rivera eventually may accept the three-year, $45 million deal the Yankees have offered him, but the closer isn't quite ready to do so just yet.
It appears as though Rivera has given up on the idea of getting a fourth guaranteed year from the Yankees, but according to a source with knowledge of the situation, Rivera still is trying to negotiate some type of option for 2011, one that could kick in based on the number of games the righthander finishes during the first three years of the deal.
The Yankees increased their original offer to Rivera of three years and $39 million by $2 million per season, which would give him an annual average salary of $15 million, making him the highest-paid closer by more than $4 million per year.
But after hearing Hank Steinbrenner speak publicly about his age (the closer turns 38 at the end of the month), Rivera seems determined to get something else put into the contract. If Rivera can't get the Yankees to budge, according to a source, he is expected to accept the three-year deal, which he hasn't yet, despite an Internet report to the contrary. Have you clicked on the link to the article? Because on the right hand side are "Related Articles." I emplore you to look at the first one listed. It is a link to a DAILY NEWS article entitled "Rivera, Yankees finalize deal" and was published Monday, December 17th, two full days before this piece was written:
Mariano Rivera, Yankees finalize deal
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Monday, December 17th 2007, 4:58 PM
Mariano Rivera and the New York Yankees made it official Monday, finalizing a $45 million, three-year contract that will keep the ace closer in pinstripes. Is this the aforementioned contrarian "Internet report"? (Note: I capitalized Internet so as to best emulate Mark Feisand.)
Perhaps the "Internet report" is this press release from the NEW YORK YANKEES:
YANKEES SIGN MARIANO RIVERA TO A THREE-YEAR CONTRACT
The New York Yankees announced today they have signed right-handed closer Mariano Rivera, the American League’s all-time saves leader, to a three-year contract.
Rivera, 37, owns 443 career saves, the most in franchise history and the third-most all-time behind Trevor Hoffman (524) and Lee Smith (478). His 395 saves over the last 10 years are the most in the Majors while his 787 career appearances are the most-ever by a Yankees pitcher and place him in 42nd place on baseball’s all-time list. Among pitchers with at least 200 save opportunities, Rivera’s 88.2 percent career save conversion rate (443-for-502) is second-best all time, behind only Trevor Hoffman (89.3).
The Panama native was originally signed by the Yankees as a non-drafted free agent on February 17, 1990 and is currently the longest tenured Yankee (12 yrs, 105 days). Misleading, confusing headline in that press release? Possibly, to one such as the great Mark Feisand.
Feisand refuses to stop there with his intrepid reporting. Later on in the December 19th article, this bit of breaking news comes to the forefront:
The Yankees also are waiting for word from Andy Pettitte on whether he plans to play in 2008 or retire, but they would likely go into spring training with Chien-Ming Wang, Chamberlain, Phil Hughes, Mike Mussina and Ian Kennedy in the rotation rather than pay big money for a free-agent starter should Pettitte retire. Tuesday, December 4th, 2007. Source: New York Daily News:
The Yankees did add another lefthander to their rotation yesterday, as Andy Pettitte informed the club he would return for another season, but the Santana situation loomed large over the Opryland Hotel during the first day of the meetings. Peter Abraham reported the contract was official on December 12th.
So... what's Feisand doing? Bong hits with Raissman in the print room?
Also I know.. a blog post slamming a Daily News writer that isn't Lupica. Crazy, huh? Don't worry gentle readers, I've been preparing a new installment of my Lupica posts. It should be up tomorrow.Labels: andy pettitte, douchebag, mariano rivera, mark feisand
posted by Mr. Faded Glory @ 11:01 AM
2
comments
 
|
Monday, December 17, 2007 |
In the NFL, Steroid Use is Accepted
I've written before about how fans embrace NFL players caught cheating like Shawne Merriman, who got caught with steroids, suspended for four games, and then named to the Pro Bowl.
Jayson Stark has an interesting look at the cases of Andy Pettitte and Rodney Harrison:
Player A is a long-time star for a team that has won multiple titles. Great guy. Beloved by fans and teammates alike. Then finds himself connected with an HGH story he can't escape.
So he admits it. Admits he bought it. Admits he took it. Admits he did that over a long period of time, during which his team won championships and he was an All-Star. Admits he "sent the wrong message" to kids and to the public. Admits he's "very, very embarrassed."
But Player A also says he wants to make it clear he never used steroids. And the only reason he used HGH was because he was hurt and wanted to get back on the field to help his team.
OK, now let's move on to Player B -- another terrific player for teams that did nothing but win. Another likeable guy. Fan favorite. Clubhouse favorite. Then looks up one day and hears his name all over TV and radio, linked to HGH use.
So Player B takes some time to think about how he should react, then confesses. Confesses by saying he was injured at the time. Confesses by saying he felt an obligation to get back and help his team. Confesses by saying he'd heard a lot of talk about the healing properties of HGH, so he tried it briefly, then stopped.
It didn't feel right. It wasn't the kind of player or person he was, or is. So he stopped. And ohbytheway, he never used steroids, either, despite what people have been saying about him.
Two stories that couldn't be more identical, right?
But Player B wakes up the next morning to find a headline that says: "PLEASE SPARE US."
Player A, on the other hand, is greeted by headlines like this one: "DON'T SINGLE OUT (PLAYER A)."
Hmmmm. What's up with that?
Two indistinguishable stories. Two very different reactions. Why is that, anyway?
Well, you probably figured out that Player B is Pettitte, a fellow who plays baseball for a living.
Player A, on the other hand, is New England Patriots safety Rodney Harrison, a guy who plays in that Teflon National Football League, in which all those chiseled bodies are clearly on the up and up.
Where's the outrage over Rodney Harrison, huh? We've been waiting for it to show up in some form, any form, for weeks now. We're still waiting. We'll probably wait a lifetime. The media loves giving NFL guys a pass. It's hypocrasy. Where's the outrage? Harrison has been a better NFL player than Pettitte has been a MLB player, and won (another) Superbowl last year and is playing on an undefeated team.
But hey, he plays football, give the guy a break.Labels: andy pettitte, dirty stinking cheaters, mitchell report, nfl, rodney harrison, shawne merriman
posted by Mr. Faded Glory @ 2:13 PM
0
comments
 
|
Thursday, September 20, 2007 |
|
Thursday, August 23, 2007 |
The Stopper
Andy Pettitte is not perfect, and he has his detractors, but check out this stat (per Elias): For his career when pitching following a Yankees loss, Andy Pettitte is 68-33 as a Yankee.
That is impressive.Labels: andy pettitte
posted by Mr. Faded Glory @ 10:34 AM
0
comments
 
$20 Says He Could Still Outhit Doug Mientkiewicz
Andy Pettitte threw a simulated game in Tampa today, and had an unusal defense behind him. Throw Cano at 2B and I would honestly be surprised if this infield wouldn't be better than the current one.
Posada caught Pettitte. The infield was A-Rod, Jeter, minor-league second baseman Kevin Russo and a slightly older, slick-fielding first baseman named Donald Arthur Mattingly.
Mattingly made a play on Phillips in the final inning. In the same inning, Jeter fielded a ball and threw short, forcing Mattingly to make a scoop.
So, Derek, did you do that on purpose?
“Nah,” said Jeter, who was grinning ear-to-ear. Labels: andy pettitte, don mattingly, yankee history
posted by Mr. Faded Glory @ 12:56 PM
1
comments
 
|
L
I N K S
P
R E V I O U
S P O S T S
A
R C H I V E
S
|